Contributors

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Saint Augustine of Hippo on Witchcraft

I recently read an article at Crisis Magazine refuting the absurd claims made by some modern groups (mostly neo-pagans and those who simply enjoy bashing the Church) that nine million people have been executed as witches over the centuries.  The article makes some good points, but it misses the boat with a few others.  Notably, it rather casually dismissed the existence of witches, so that by definition all those executed for witchcraft were falsely accused.

Odds nipperkins


This is accomplished mostly in this passage:
Many cultures around the world believed for millennia — and still believe — in witches. In typical folklore, past and present, witches are night-flying evildoers who inflict harm on others by supernatural means, such as curses, the evil eye, and magic substances. Witchcraft is usually thought of as an innate power, unlike sorcery, whose magical spells must be learned.

The example to keep in mind here is Circe, who bewitched and seduced Odysseus.  She was supposed to be the daughter of the sun god Helios, so she would indeed have certain innate powers.  In more modern terms, think of Samantha and her family from the TV show Bewitched.  Somehow they were born with the inherent capacity for magic, only using incantations for the more dramatic spells. 

It is only in the light of such examples that any sense can be made of the assertion 
But to St. Augustine, concrete witchcraft consisted of idolatry and illusion rather than harm to others. Following Augustine, an anonymous ninth-century text, Canon Episcopi, became part of the Church’s canon law, declaring that belief in the reality of night-flying witches was heresy because there was no such thing as an actual witch.

In other words, to the extent that this is true, it is true only for a definition of witch that no one really uses today -- notably including modern adherents of Wicca, who are all humans, not literally demigods. 

In fact, though, the assertion that the term "witch" means only a being like Circe or Samantha is not historically true; it has usually been taken to be synonymous with "sorcerer" or "sorceress".  This is how it was used in Exodus 22:18:
Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
Related passages include Leviticus 19:31:
Regard not them that have familiar spirits, neither seek after wizards, to be defiled by them: I am the Lord your God.
and Deuteronomy 18:9-12:
When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch.  Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.  For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.
Witchcraft is clearly listed as an abomination that may be learned, not an inborn ability; it is, in other words, either identical to sorcery or the same basic thing with minor variations.  Needless to say, St. Augustine would have been well aware of these passages, and St. Augustine never casually dismissed Scripture.

As for sorcery itself, here is what St. Augustine said about it in City of God, Book XXI, Chapter 6:
For to this inextinguishable lamp we add a host of marvels wrought by men, or by magic,— that is, by men under the influence of devils, or by the devils directly—for such marvels we cannot deny without impugning the truth of the sacred Scriptures we believe. That lamp, therefore, was either by some mechanical and human device fitted with asbestos, or it was arranged by magical art in order that the worshippers might be astonished, or some devil under the name of Venus so signally manifested himself that this prodigy both began and became permanent. Now devils are attracted to dwell in certain temples by means of the creatures (God's creatures, not theirs), who present to them what suits their various tastes. They are attracted not by food like animals, but, like spirits, by such symbols as suit their taste, various kinds of stones, woods, plants, animals, songs, rites. And that men may provide these attractions, the devils first of all cunningly seduce them, either by imbuing their hearts with a secret poison, or by revealing themselves under a friendly guise, and thus make a few of them their disciples, who become the instructors of the multitude. For unless they first instructed men, it were impossible to know what each of them desires, what they shrink from, by what name they should be invoked or constrained to be present. Hence the origin of magic and magicians.

Were there people wrongly convicted and executed for sorcery?  Certainly.  Also for treason, murder, and quite a few other crimes which used to be punished by death.  But it is every bit as possible to be a witch as to be a traitor or an assassin.  It is misleading to imply that St. Augustine thought otherwise.

8 comments:

  1. In the case of witchcraft, the use of torture forced confessions from innocent old women. Most convicted witches were guilty of no crime at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Are you saying torture forced confessions only from innocent old women, but not from anyone else? Or are you implying that only innocent old women were accused of witchcraft? Neither statement is true.

      It is also interesting that you only claim "most" convicted witches were guilty of no crime at all. That really adds little to what the last paragraph already said, though.

      [This comment was deleted and re-posted to correct a spelling error.]

      Delete
    3. I wouldn't want to agree with the 1st comment as it is too general to accept. not only old women were accused of practicing witchcraft rather anyone could be accused of the "crime". However it can be agreed that torture played a role in terrorizing people to confess whether men or women, young or old.

      Delete
    4. The same can be said for other "crimes", like, for instance, "trying to blow up the English king and parliament". It is a sad fact that torture was used back then; the use of torture makes confessions suspect, but it does not guarantee that they are untrue. The US has used torture in the "War on Terror", but terrorists are still a real thing.

      Again, just looking at the world as it is today, it should be obvious that some people would be willing to TRY to sell their souls for money or power or to cause harm to their enemies. We blame Richard Reid, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, and Faisal Shahzad for what they TRIED to do, even though their attempts at terrorism failed.

      Delete
  2. Augustine actually declared that power to affect any change in the natural world was God's alone..the devil has no power of his own..and to ascribe power to any other than God is a folly of pagans..the devil can tempt..but that's not power over nature or natural laws..demons can't bring storms..kill people themselves or influence the outcome of chance..only God may do these things..and to claim otherwise is to insult God's ultimate power over everything..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I quoted St. Augustine directly, and I showed where to find the quote. Please do the same.

      Context matters. In a sense, no creature has power of its own, including humans. Take the 9/11 hijackers as an example. However much will they may have had to kill people, a thousand things could have prevented it, even without an obvious miracle (like the planes passing through the buildings like through a cloud). For example, their car(s) could have been involved in an accident on the way to the airport, killing them all despite their preparations. Yet we rightly attribute the deaths on 9/11 to the hijackers without denying the sovereignty of God. Regarding demons, they drove the Gadarene swine into the water and drowned them, though God could have prevented it. Perhaps more to the point, "Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man;" yet "Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil."

      One way of thinking about this is by asking who killed Mr. Arrow in Treasure Island. Long John Silver willed and planned the death, but strictly speaking, all he did was allow Mr. Arrow to get drunk, then he let nature take its course. In another sense, then, Mr. Arrow killed himself. In yet another sense, both men and all their actions came from the pen of Robert Louis Stevenson, but it would be misleading at best to say, "Robert Louis Stevenson killed Mr. Arrow."

      Delete